This page was last updated on 25 February 2016

Click here to 
Print this page

Biography finder

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

 

 

Index of first names

George Douglas, 13th Earl of Morton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This page is a Stub - you can help improve it

 

George, born in 1662, was the 5th son of Sir James of Smithfield, 10th Earl of Morton and the 3rd of his sons to bear the Morton titles. 

 

George was a Lt. Colonel in the Army and a Minister of Parliament for Kirkwall and subsequently for Linlithgow then the Isles of Orkney and Shetland (following Sir Alexander Douglas)  prior to succeeding to the earldom in 1730. 

From 1725 until his death he was Lord Lieutenant of Orkney and Shetland.

 

George married a daughter of Alexander Muirhead and after she died he married Frances Adderley, daughter of William Adderley of Holston, Kent. 

 

He died January 4, 1738 at the age of 76.

 

Douglas entered the army shortly after escaping prosecution for murder in 1685. The dispute which led to the killing originated in the theft of a dog that was later found in the possession of the laird of Chatto. While Chatto accepted Douglas’ claim to ownership, this was disputed by one of the laird’s footmen, who had the temerity to confront him in public. Dismissing the servant as a mere ‘rascal’, Douglas was shocked to find the insult returned in kind, ‘which being such an indignity and affront to a gentleman’ he ‘did step back and make to his sword, but the footman before he got it drawn did hit him twice with a cudgel’. Douglas was thus able to claim self-defence. ‘Still retiring and with his sword warding the blows’ was how Douglas described his own reaction, whereas that of the footman was characterized as ‘so earnest and furious that he run himself upon the point of the petitioner’s sword and so was killed’. This barely credible account was sufficient to exculpate the son of a peer, though his departure for military service was perhaps an additional insurance against any reprisal. Rewarded for his role in quelling the anti-Union disturbances at Glasgow in 1706, Douglas otherwise proved a competent but undistinguished soldier. He was passed over for promotion, despite having for ‘many years undergone the whole care and charge of managing’ his regiment. When the colonelcy was purchased by Hon. William Kerr in 1709, Douglas retired, merely receiving a non-regimental commission and a pension of 10s. a day. He encountered difficulties in extracting payment: not until 1717 was a retrospective grant made in his favour with effect from December 1710.

Douglas had entered Parliament in 1708 as a supporter of the Duke of Queensberry’s Court party. His brothers, the 11th Earl of Morton and Hon. Robert Douglas, were longstanding members of this connexion. Douglas, who had complained of the passivity of the Scottish Court party prior to the general election, secured a seat on his own initiative at Linlithgow Burghs. An inactive Member, Douglas’ only known vote in this Parliament was for the impeachment of Dr Sacheverell.

Re-elected for Linlithgow Burghs in 1710, Douglas was described by Richard Dongworth, chaplain to the Duchess of Buccleuch, as a Court Tory. In common with his patron Queensberry, he supported the new ministry. As before, he made little impression in Parliament, apart from being mentioned in the report of the commissioners of accounts on 21 Dec. 1711 in connexion with the allegedly corrupt handling of forage contracts by Robert Walpole II. Douglas, who had been favoured by Walpole in 1709–10, gave no evidence to the commission and was not subjected to any direct censure. His partner John Montgomerie I did admit that the contracts had been obtained only after the payment of sweeteners. Douglas spoke in Walpole’s defence on 17 Jan. 1712, but his intervention was insufficient to prevent expulsion. The death of Queensberry in July 1711 had left Douglas without an obvious patron among the Scottish magnates. He gravitated towards the Earl of Mar, but later became dissatisfied with what he perceived as his neglect, in particular over a civil case in the court of session. Douglas came gradually into the orbit of the Duke of Argyll and his brother Lord Ilay. He was listed as absent though in town for the vote on 7 Feb. 1712 upon the Scottish toleration bill, though it remains unclear whether this was indicative of scruples or mere indifference. In a letter to Lord Oxford (Robert Harley), written from Scotland in August, Douglas described himself as a government supporter; but like other Scots, he came to resent the ministry’s conduct during the malt tax crisis of 1713. Disillusioned at English unwillingness either to defer the imposition or reduce the burden of this tax, Douglas was active in the ensuing campaign for a dissolution of the Union. He advocated an immediate secession from Parliament and an electoral boycott. This suggestion was rejected at a combined meeting of Scottish parliamentary representatives on 26 May 1713. His aggressive stance, in common with that of Hon. Charles Rosse, may reflect the influence of Argyll, but no conclusive evidence can be adduced to support this hypothesis. Douglas attended the Lords on 1 June for the debate on Lord Findlater’s motion for leave to introduce a bill for dissolving the Union. He thought that Findlater ‘made a handsome discourse’ and that Mar ‘spoke well’. His highest praise was reserved for Argyll, however, who ‘spoke like an angel’. Douglas remained disenchanted with the ministry even after the return to the fold of Mar and other Scottish Court supporters in the aftermath of Lord Oxford’s narrow victory on this question. Unwilling to oppose the ministry outright, Douglas nevertheless absented himself from the votes on 4 and 18 June over the French commerce bill. He returned to Scotland shortly afterwards, all thoughts of boycott now abandoned, in order to prepare for the coming election. His activities included advising Morton to support Robert Munro in the election for Tain Burghs, and forwarding the Earl’s proxy to Mar for the Scottish peerage election. Morton thus supported the entire Court list, from which Ilay had been excluded because he and Argyll had fallen out with the ministry. Douglas neither endorsed nor condemned Ilay’s abortive attempt to obtain Squadrone votes in the peerage election; but, for his own reasons, Douglas came to an electoral pact with Sir James Carmichael, 4th Bt., who enjoyed Squadrone support in Linlithgowshire.

Douglas’ re-election for Linlithgow Burghs appeared doubtful because of the determination of the 4th Duchess of Hamilton to secure the return of her own nominee. Douglas contented himself, therefore, with a spoiling operation against the Duchess, contriving to support Carmichael in return for a promise of Lanark’s vote at the next election. With the family interest in Orkney and Shetland at his disposal, he was able to obtain an alternative seat. He did not attend the election in person, but the contest was managed effectively by his brother, Robert. In return for his speech in 1712, Douglas was promised Walpole’s support over the subsequent election case. Although a petition was entered against Douglas, it was never reported.

Little is known of Douglas’ conduct in the 1713 Parliament, but Lord Polwarth’s description of him as a Jacobite in his analysis of the Scottish returns should not be taken literally. One modern historian has nevertheless compounded the error by stating that Douglas was involved in Jacobite plotting, but the letter cited in support of this assertion was written from France by a Jacobite namesake at a time when Douglas himself was in Scotland. His only known vote, on 12 May 1714, was against the Whig amendment to the schism bill which sought to extend its provisions to Catholics. Douglas was nevertheless listed as a Whig in one comparative analysis of the 1713 and 1715 Parliaments. The Worsley list also classified him as a Whig, but, if an annotation next to the name of James Moodie (who had never previously sat) was actually intended to apply to Douglas, he should be regarded as a Whig who had sometimes voted with the Tories.

By virtue of the pact made at the previous election, Douglas was returned for Linlithgow Burghs in 1715. He supported the Argathelian interest under George I, and succeeded as 13th Earl of Morton in January 1730, being also elected a representative peer at a by-election later that year caused by the death of Findlater. Douglas was a government supporter in the Upper House, but was not re-elected in 1734. He died on 4 Jan. 1738.

 

 

  • Birth: 1662
  • Death: 4 JAN 1738

    Father: James (10th Earl of Morton) Douglas
    Mother: Anne Hay

    Marriage 1 (of Linhouse) Muirhead
    Marriage 2 Bartlett Children
    1. Has No Children William Domini Douglas b: 2 MAY 1732 in at or near Belfast in Ireland
  • NOTE: It now seems very unlikely that he was a son of the 13th earl, as DNA testing seems to disprove links back to the earls of Morton at this stage. Follow the link to his page for more details.

  • Marriage 3 Frances (of Halsgow) Adderly
    • Married: BEF. 1702
    Children
    1. Has Children James (14th Earl of Morton) Douglas b: 1709
    2. Has No Children Robert Douglas - Death: 30 APR 1745 in Battle of Fontenoy

 

See also The Earls of Morton

 

Any contributions will be gratefully accepted

 

 




Errors and Omissions

The Forum

What's new?

We are looking for your help to improve the accuracy of The Douglas Archives.

If you spot errors, or omissions, then please do let us know

Contributions

Many articles could benefit from re-writing. Can you help?


 

If you have met a brick wall with your research, then posting a notice in the Douglas Archives Forum may be the answer. Or, it may help you find the answer!

You may also be able to help others answer their queries.

Visit the Douglas Archives Forum.

 

We try to keep everyone up to date with new entries, via our What's New section on the home page.

We also use the Community Network to keep researchers abreast of developments in the Douglas Archives.

 
 
 

Back to top

The content of this website is a collection of materials gathered from a variety of sources, some of it unedited.

The webmaster does not intend to claim authorship, but gives credit to the originators for their work.

As work progresses, some of the content may be re-written and presented in a unique format, to which we would then be able to claim ownership.

Discussion and contributions from those more knowledgeable is welcome.

Contact Us

Last modified: Saturday, 18 March 2017