logoTitleMasthead
 

Troqueer Castle
This page was last updated on 19 October 2023

Click here to 
Print this page

Biography finder

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

 

 

Index of first names

motte  

 

This page is a stub.  You can help improve it.

Catledykes Park is a possible site of Troqueer Castle, belonging to the Earls of Douglas (1369-1455. It was politically part of lordhip of Galloway but later part of Dumfriesshire.

Dumfries Castle was an important royal castle from the 13th century, the remains of which can be found in Castledykes Park, a public park to the south of Dumfries on the east bank of the River Nith. The original layout of the castle is unknown because of extensive landscaping that predated the opening of the park, but evidence of a large (and truncated) ditched mound can still be seen.

It is likely that the castle of Dumfries occupies an earlier fortification built by the Lords of Galloway or those of Nithsdale, and it is known that the reign of King William saw a slow advance of royal power into the south-west of Scotland, and also the status of Dumfries upgraded to that of a royal borough. Given the complexity of the earthworks and the scale of the park, serious questions have to be asked about the site – which is directly opposite is the impressive Mote of Troqueer, another 12th century castle. The medieval burgh is well to the north. It may be that the castle site, like that of Dingwall, was fortified by the Norse as a longphort in an earlier age, and that the castle only occupied part of the site – perhaps the northern end, where the natural bedrock seems to create a motte of sorts.

The castle was occupied by the English in 1290 and again in the Wars of Independence. It was also at Dumfries (although not in the castle) that Robert Bruce murdered John Comyn, triggering his coronation. The castle was probably destroyed by Bruce supporters in 1313 after it surrendered, and there is no evidence that it was brought back into use, and by 1335 the “mote of the castle” was not producing revenue, suggesting that the site may have already been out of use for some time and used for grazing.

Source

 

Sources for this article include:
  • xxx

    Any contributions will be gratefully accepted





    Errors and Omissions

    The Forum

    What's new?

    We are looking for your help to improve the accuracy of The Douglas Archives.

    If you spot errors, or omissions, then please do let us know


    Contributions

    Many articles are stubs which would benefit from re-writing. Can you help?


    Copyright

    You are not authorized to add this page or any images from this page to Ancestry.com (or its subsidiaries) or other fee-paying sites without our express permission and then, if given, only by including our copyright and a URL link to the web site.

    		  

    If you have met a brick wall with your research, then posting a notice in the Douglas Archives Forum may be the answer. Or, it may help you find the answer!

    You may also be able to help others answer their queries.

    Visit the Douglas Archives Forum.

     

    2 Minute Survey

    To provide feedback on the website, please take a couple of minutes to complete our survey.

    		  

    We try to keep everyone up to date with new entries, via our What's New section on the home page.

    We also use the Community Network to keep researchers abreast of developments in the Douglas Archives.


    Help with costs

    Maintaining the three sections of the site has its costs.  Any contribution the defray them is very welcome
    Donate

     

    Newsletter

    If you would like to receive a very occasional newsletter - Sign up!
    Temporarily withdrawn.
    		 
    		 
     


    •  

    Back to top

     



    The content of this website is a collection of materials gathered from a variety of sources, some of it unedited.

    The webmaster does not intend to claim authorship, but gives credit to the originators for their work.

    As work progresses, some of the content may be re-written and presented in a unique format, to which we would then be able to claim ownership.

    Discussion and contributions from those more knowledgeable is welcome.

    Contact Us

    Last modified: Monday, 25 March 2024